The Justifications of Merciless Killing by the U.S

A country that always makes itself seem as the peacekeeper, builds an enormous weapon to destroy and harm a country, and justifies it by making it seem as if the other country, Japan, was the one who brought it upon themselves. Is it possible that a country, like the United States, could be as ruthless as Hitler himself? The press release given to the public by President Truman attempts to justify the need for the use of a potent weapon, while diverting the attention from the harmful effects: however, other documents such as, Truman’s Diary, a survivor’s story and recent newspapers recognize the harmful effects and the amount of destruction that would be a result of the weapon being used. They ignored the most important aspect of the†¦show more content†¦We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man. A single one of our newly developed atomic bombs is actually the equivalent in explosive power to what 2000 of our giant B-29s can car ry on a single mission. This awful fact is one for you to ponder and we solemnly assure you it is grimly accurate.†(Translation of leaflet dropped on the Japanese) This leaflet was dropped on Japan after Hiroshima was attack and was warning other cities of the other bomb. The American government makes themselves seem as if they were put into a war they did not want but that since the Japanese started the war they must finish it. The president during his speech on August 6th, 1945 said, â€Å"It was to spare the Japanese people from utter destruction that the ultimatum of July 26 was issued at the Potsdam. There leaders promptly rejected that ultimatum. If they do not now accept our terms they many accept the rain of ruins from the air the like of which has never been seen on this earth.† (Press Release By The White House.)Saying that they gave the Japanese people the chance to surrender but they did not accept is a way in which they justify killing and destroying a city . Even though Truman compares what the bomb does to Hitler’s destruction, he justifies there reason to use it by saying that they give them a warning, which was something that Hitler wouldShow MoreRelatedThe War Of National Liberation Front Of Algeria1156 Words   |  5 Pagesterrorists), British backers in SOE had been ordered by prime minister Winston Churchill to set Europe ablaze they weren`t terrorist but freedom fighters. Their work of sabotage and ambush was a tactic of a war of national liberation. This was the justification used after the war by many anticolonial movements, like the Viet minh against French rule in Vietnam. They were supplied to fight to fight the Japanese later, after 1945, the Japanese used the same wartime tactics of resistance to attack theRead MoreEssay on Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass1097 Words   |  5 Pagesincluding the Holy Bible, can be distorted to advance our position. A current example of this is todays Muslim terrori sts who are using teachings in their Koran to justify their position saying that the Koran dictates that they must fight a holy war, killing as many Christians and Jews as possible, even going so far as to sacrifice their own lives in the process. This sort of religious distortion, used to justify mans self-serving will, is what writer and former slave, Frederick Douglass exposes in hisRead More Truman, the Atomic Bomb, and the Shaping of the Postwar World6419 Words   |  26 Pagesthe United States dropped atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945, it brought about a dramatic change. Within two weeks of the bombings, Japan had surrendered and World War II had ended. The United States was victorious; and with that victory, the U.S. was in a position to dictate change as never before. The atomic bomb brought about changes in diplomacy between the Soviet Union and the United States. With the Cold War came a greater chance of a nuclear war. Truman had a few options in endingRead MoreUnethical Orders in the Military2731 Words   |  11 Pagesorders face immense punishment from the forces or the appointing office (Miller, 2010). In most of the militaries, it is considered an offence for a military officer to disobey orders willingly, which may be accompanied by death. For instance, the U.S constitution provides that during a war, an officer who willingly disobeys orders from his superior faces up to a death sentence. This constitutional requirement can be viewed as, motivators, for the military officers to follow orders from their superiorsRead MoreThe War Of The United States Essay2042 Words   |  9 PagesIn a letter to his wife, he said that he gave specific instructions to the Interim Committee to only â€Å"use it so that military objectives and soldiers and sailors are the target and not women and children. Even if the Japs are savages, ruthless, merciless and fanatic, we as the leader of the world for the common welfare cannot drop this terrible bomb on the old capital or the new [Kyoto or Tokyo].† This was a key point for Truman after he learned of the capacity to destroy. Even though the InterimRead MoreThe Elaine Massacre By Elaine Riots2430 Words   |  10 Pagesthe nearby Arkansas provinces, but even through the Mississippi river that was next to Elaine, to place down what was described by them as an insurgency. On October 1, Phillips County consultants sent three messages to Gov. Brough, demanding that the U.S. troops should be directed to Elaine. Brough responded by attaining authorization from the Constituent part of War to send more than 1000 combat certified troops from Camp Pike, that’s Little Rock of Pulaski County. After the white-armed forcesRead MoreTime to Regulate the Grant of the Second Ammendment 1893 Words   |  8 PagesHook Elementary School. This incident shows that although Mrs. Lanza had gone through the proper procedure to buy her guns legally, she was still incompetent of proper and responsible gun ownership which led to her son taking advantage of that and killing 26 people. There are only so many cases where mass shootings involved the use of military style assault weapons, but there are even more cases where the shootings are not mass murders. For example, if you look at incidents such as drive by shootingsRead MoreColumbus, The Indians, And Human Progress5743 Words   |  23 Pagesimportant because it proves how cruel the Europeans were and how unnecessary their acts were. Zinn mentions the different ideals between the societies of the Indians and the Europeans to describe the peacefulness of the Indians and the cruelty and justification of the Spaniards motives. He mentions, â€Å"The concept of private ownership of land and homes was foreign to the Iroquois† which meant that there was no hierarchy based on wealth unlike the Spanish and English whom were introduced to that idea longRead MoreGp Essay Mainpoints24643 Words   |  99 Pagessole purpose is to uncover each and every piece of information related to the news article they are writing †¢ Wider and deeper coverage †¢ Connections to a wider spectrum of professionals ( greater insight into issue at hand †¢ E.g. 2008 U.S. Presidential Elections (bloggers provide personal opinions about who was likely to win but New York Times invited experts to do a state-by-state analysis presenting results in a full-page spread, culminating in a detailed map showing states Democrats

Can the Human Spirit Be Imprisoned free essay sample

World Literature #1: Comparative Essay Can the human spirit be imprisoned? A Doll’s House and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich NAME: Shelley Lima IB CANDIDATE NUMBER: 000091-032 TEACHER  : Kate Goldberg DISCIPLINE OF ESSAY: English WORD COUNT: 1 492 Both Ivan, the protagonist from the novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich written by Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Nora, the character from the play A Doll’s House written by Ibsen, are two characters whose lives are imprisoned, either physically or mentally. The character Ivan is physically imprisoned in a gulag camp in Russia where he has to find escape routes from his imprisoned life to find pleasure in his everyday life. The character of Nora is figuratively imprisoned in her marriage and she has to find aspects of her life that let her escape and find her own self somewhere in her caged situation. In the novel by Solzhenitsyn, Ivan uses many physical escape routes, such as food, tobacco, work, and human relationships to take a step away from his imprisoned life. In the play by Ibsen, Nora’s primary escape route to her imprisoned life is her secret work life where she can earn money on her own for her family and for herself. Both of these imprisoned lives, in two different pieces of world literature, pose the questioncan the human spirit be imprisoned? Alexander Solzhenitsyns One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is a short novel centering on one prisoners experiences during a single day in a Soviet labor camp. The four walls of the camp physically imprison Ivan and the only way his mind can be free from this confinement is if he finds mental escape routes in his everyday life. Food, tobacco, work, and his relationships with his friends inside the camp are the principle mental escape routes that are prominent in this novel. When Ivan is put in a situation where living is a burden, he needs to find little pleasures in his life that help him overcome his imprisonment. Food plays a main role in Ivan’s life because the sensory value of individual foods let his spirit be free. A spirit is the non-physical part of the human body, which Ivan tries to keep free in his confined life. Although Ivan’s physical being is confined within the four walls of the camp, his mental state, or his spirit, escapes when he enjoys certain aspects of life. The descriptive sense of taste is vividly described in the passage on page 19: â€Å"Pavlo handed him his bread ration from the table. There was a little white heap of sugar on top of it. [†¦] He scooped up the sugar with his lips, licked the bread clean with his tongue, and put one leg on the ledge to climb up and make his bed. He looked at the ration, turning it, weighing it in his hand as he moved, to see if it was the full point due to him. †[1] The small sensation of flavor when he eats the tasty food gives the reader a sense that his spirit is free throughout those minor moments. Ivan makes the best of the minute ration he has. All living beings have senses, yet one does not always appreciate these senses when the spirit is free. When the spirit or physical being is imprisoned, the body embellishes on the senses and takes into consideration all the senses throughout life. Although Ivan is the protagonist in this novel, you can tell that food is a main part of the other prisoners’ lives too. This theme of food is like a ritual for the prisoners. These moments of eating are also a time when Ivan’s only concern is himself. When the author uses description and senses, the ritual is clearer to the reader. The pleasure of food is ostracized when one is a prisoner of everything else. Tobacco and the process of smoking also free Ivan’s spirit and becomes one of his escape routes from his confined life. According to Ivan, smoking tobacco is a relief because in that moment all he thinks about is the smoke traveling in and out of his lungs and he does not have to worry about anything else. On page 23, it says, â€Å"he’d rather have this butt than his freedom. †[2] This implies that at that moment smoking a cigarette is more important than life and freedom itself. Just like the vivid sensation of food, on page 24 Ivan smokes the tobacco until it filled his body. It says, â€Å"He took it with one hand, quickly and thankfully, and put his other hand underneath to guard against dropping it. He wasn’t hurt because Caesar was squeamish about letting him smoke it in the holder (some people have clean mouth, other have foul mouths), and it didn’t hurt his hardened fingers when the butt burned right down to them. The great thing was that he’d beaten that scavenger Fetyokov to it, and here he was now smoking away till it burned his lips. Mmmm†¦. The smoke seemed to go all through his hungry body and into his feet and his head. Just as this wonderful feeling spread all through him, Ivan Denisovich heard a roar from the men. [3] Smoking let Ivan escape from his other problems in life while freeing his human spirit. Working gives man a purpose in the world. Work is a pleasure and an aspect of the everyday life that Ivan uses to escape from his confined physical being. â€Å"Not being at work – that was the real punishment†[4]. Unlike the escape routes of food and tobacco, when Ivan speaks about work, there is no physical sensation that he under goes; yet he seems more pleasant and joyful when working. â€Å"Shukhov looked up to the sky and gasped. It was clear, and by the sun it was almost noon. It was a funny thing how time flew when you were working! He was always struck by how fast the days went in camp—you didn’t have time to turn around†[5] The reader notices his excitement for working with the enthusiastic tone of his voice. Working took his mind off his confined situation. The sensation of joy that Ivan feels while working gives freedom to his spirit while his body is physically in prison. Ivan’s relationships in the camp give him a sense of human attributes while being imprisoned like an animal. The first time you get the sense that the prisoners in the camp are being treated like animals is when Pavlo asked Ivan â€Å"Didn’t they put you in the cooler, Ivan Denisovich? Are you still alive? †[6] Although in camp they are treated like animals by the guards and by the people who run the camp, among the prisoners â€Å"they were polite to people and addressed them by their full name†[7]. This gives Ivan a sense that he is a human being and that all the prisoners as well as himself deserve to be addressed like humans. Although Ivan is physically stuck in a camp, his relationships and manners keep his spirit alive. Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House evokes a sense of imprisonment through the character of Nora. Unlike Ivan in Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s novel, Nora’s imprisonment is not physical, yet her marriage with Helmer is a figurative and symbolic imprisonment. In this play, Nora’s imprisoned life is not as evident as in the novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, yet the reader gets a sense of her imprisonment through the other characters in the play. Another interesting aspect of Nora’s imprisonment is the fact that she is always shown inside her house, which makes her house seems more like a cage. The reader gets the sense of Nora’s imprisonment through the macaroon scene, the dance for her life, and the way Helmer addresses Nora. Although Nora is imprisoned in this marriage, she has her work as escape route for her spirit. Nora’s imprisoned life is presented through many aspects of her marriage. The way Helmer addresses Nora evokes a sense of confinement in her own home. He addresses her many times with â€Å"my squirrel†[8], â€Å"my own little lark†[9], and â€Å"my sweet tooth†[10]. Helmer addresses Nora as if she belonged to him, which evokes a symbolism of Nora being imprisoned under Helmer’s thumb. The first time the reader physically sees a sense of imprisonment is when Nora has to lie to Helmer about buying a little macaroon. She says in defense to Helmer that she could never go against him. This lie is an act of submission and it represents Nora’s imprisonment. Lastly, Nora’s confinement is also shown through her dance of her life. Helmer says on page 92, â€Å"but Nora darling, you dance as if your life was at stake. †[11] This statement indicates Nora’s imprisonment because the dance is also an escape, yet Helmer interrupts her while she is dancing. Helmer is interrupting her escape route, which in this circumstance is her dance. Similar to Solzhenitsyn’s novel, Nora’s escape route is working at her secret job. Nora represents the imprisoned woman, a human being with no voice and no real power. However, Nora does not just go through her everyday life without questioning her existence; she earns her own money when her family needs it. When working, Nora feels in control and feels as though she can accomplish something on her own, her imprisoned spirit is lifted and free. Nora says, â€Å"But still it was wonderful fun, sitting and working like that, earning money. It was almost like being a man†[12]. The man is a symbol of power, adulthood, and money. Nora envies the freedom of a man, and so when she has the opportunity to be â€Å"like a man† her imprisoned spirit is free. Although people think that the money for Nora and Helmer’s trip to Italy came from another source, it was actually Nora who secretly worked for the money. Nora gets the thriving sensations of being a man and enjoys the privileges and power enjoyed by males in her society. She seems to understand the confinement she faces simply by virtue of her womenly attributes. Nora eventually realizes that she is a prisoner in her own home, and abandons her comfortable marriage and home in order to learn about herself. Without this escape route of her work, she would have not noticed her imprisoned life and would not have been able to abandon her marriage. In conclusion, the human spirit cannot be imprisoned if one has escape routes from an imprisoned life. Both the novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich and the play A Doll’s House have characters with an imprisoned life, physically and symbolically, whose spirits have been freed by small pleasures throughout their daily lives. Bibliography: Solzhenit? s? yn, Aleksander. One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich. [1st ed. New York: Dutton Co. Inc. , 1963. Print. Ibsen, Henrik. A Dolls House. Dover ed. New York: Dover Publications, 1992. Print. [1] Solzhenit? s? yn, Aleksander. One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich. [1st ed. New York: Dutton Co. Inc. , 1963. Print, p. 19 [2] ibid, p. 23 [3] ibid, p. 24 [4] ibid, p. 5 [5] ibid, p. 52 [6] ibid, p. 19 [7] ibid, p. 19 [8] Ibsen, Henrik. A dolls house. Dover ed. New York: Dover Publications, 1992. Print, p. 44 [9] ibid, p. 93 [10] ibid, p. 43 [11] ibid, p. 92 [12] ibid, p. 55